Feminocracy 
The Line Between Feminism and Child Abuse.
www.photius.com/feminocracy.html Photius Coutsoukis Tel:+1(914)739-8888, Fax:+1(914)739-8913Join the Discussion | E-mail |
Feminocracy
I draw an analogy between that sort
of genocide and what I call "America's children's
genocide", as well as between ordinary Germans/Serbians and Americans
today.
America's militant feminists and, by extension the American
people and their institutions, have attacked babies and children in the name
of feminism and other self-interest, just like Milosevic has attacked Kosovo
Albanians in the name of Serbia's people.
Goldhagen's controversial
book examined how some long-standing "eliminationist" myths within German
culture predisposed what might be thought of as normal citizens to accept,
support and in many instances actively carry out Nazi
policies of Jewish extermination.
Those policies remain a benchmark of evil in this century, and there are, of course, great differences of scale distinguishing what happened in Germany, or even Stalin's Russia, from what is happening in Serbia, but not the huge scale of America's children's genocide, perpetrated by America's vicious feminocracy.
Focusing on actions of common men and women
in both places and the willingness of many to follow murderous leads, does
not, at the moment, seem inappropriate.
Goldhagen himself thinks that
questioning the behavior of the Serbian nation is essential. "Right now is the
time when we must ask the question of how ordinary people have acted while it
can still influence events. Those who support what has been happening in
Kosovo should be made aware that they will be held complicit in what will most
likely be the last enormous crime of the century," said Goldhagen, a professor
of government at Harvard who is working on a study of genocide in the last 100
years.
This is also a good time to question the people of America
about the massive mistreatment and destruction of their children. After all,
the continuing, deliberate risking of children's health and life, in the name
of personal enrichment of their parents, has already led to public policies
that not only overlook dangers to children, but condone and encourage parental
practices that are well known to be risky, all in the name of a feministic
rationalization of adult "needs".
Former Secretary of State Lawrence
Eagleburger, who is also a former U.S. ambassador to Yugoslavia, raised a
similar point last week in an op-ed article in The New York Times:
"Although Milosevic is the prime mover behind the murder and agony
that have filled our television screens for the better part of a decade, he
has not acted alone. He may plan the strategy, but the Serbian people are the
willing instruments of his terror. There are, of course, many decent Serbs who
decry the violence, just as there were decent Germans under Hitler, but that
does not excuse the Serb nation for its part in making a killing field of so
much of the former Yugoslavia."
In the summer of 1999, Hillary Clinton, America's
first lady, made a campaign trip to New York where she told a gathering of
single mothers that the government's "job" is to make sure that they should be
able to continue to work. In other words leave the babies with perfect
strangers, as Americans prefer to do, and pursue your own self interest. By
encouraging the abandonment of infants, one can argue that America's
leadership is culpable for the ravaging of America's babies.
But Hillary was speaking to willing mothers who chose to abandon their children to
the care of strangers so as to pursue easier tasks, i.e., whatever it is that
would keep them out of the house. Hillary wants votes and America's women want
to not have to be bothered with the task of caring for their children. So, the
American's collective responsibility in the massive neglect and destruction of
their own children is no different (if anything it is even more inexcusable)
than the Germans collective responsibility for the holocaust, and as Goldhagen
has persuasively argued, there was a correlation between Hitler's policies of
extermination and the willingness of a sizable German population to support
such ideas. In an escalating manner the actions of the Nazi leader and the
approval of those he led mutually reinforced and encouraged each other. The
actions of American politicians and those of American mothers are similarly
mutually reinforcing.
And while, as Eagleburger noted, there are Serbs
who have deplored the violence, a similar reverberating process has been under
way in Serbia since 1987, when Milosevic broke Titoism's major precept of
never discussing ethnic tensions in public. Instead, he openly played to Serb
nationalist sentiments, affirming widespread Serb feelings of victimization
and martyrdom stretching back centuries.
(November 1999 Update: This
sense of victimization and paranoia was fed to the Serbs with renewed vigor by
the state media controlled by Milosevic following the desecration and
destruction of dozens of Serbian churches and monasteries by Albanians in
Kosovo and the brutal persecution and killings of Kosovo Serbs, including
innocent civilians under the ineffective NATO watch.)
A similarly
maniacal and persistent propaganda of
victimization that is promulgated by America's feminists has been used to
justify the atrocities committed on innocent children and men.
An example of political exploitation of American women's sense of
victimization was cited by Kathleen Parker who writes for
the Orlando Sentinel.
In an article titled, "Imagine a world without men" she
discussed the National
Organization for Women's fight against bill HR3037 which is intended to
restore the rights of fathers. This article ended with the writer stating,
"NOW's livelihood depends on the perception of women as victims. Strengthening
families and reinstating fatherhood threatens that status and organizations
that thrive on it".
In the case of America's children, my own
experience has been that, not only is it hard to find anyone willing to
acknowledge the children's needs for parents (as opposed to paid strangers or
institutions, so that parents can pursue their mindless "American way of
life"), but also a maniacal resistance to even acknowledging the reality of
the actual dangers, which are frequently shown in the media (many children die
in day care centers, not to mention the thousands of abandoned
children, including infants thrown in
dumpsters and toilets by their own mothers) or the visible results (85% of
the world's Ritalin
production is consumed by American
children). [Find another Ritalin
article.] Furthermore there is an on-going push for more and more
government sponsored programs to keep children of all
ages out of the home for more and more of their waking hours.
Of
course when it comes to the children of others, especially foreigners, the
attitude is even more brutal. The following exchange occurred in a "60
Minutes" segment, "Punishing Saddam" (airdate May 12, 1996): Click here for color video
and sound.) (1.2MB)
Lesley Stahl (speaking of post-war US sanctions against
Iraq):
"We have heard that a half million children have died. I
mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And - and you know, is the
price worth it?"
Madeleine Albright (at that time, US Ambassador to the UN):
"I
think this is a very hard choice, but the price - we think the price is worth
it."
What is so striking about these expressions is how
stridently they clash with images of other people that the world has been
watching, images of people burned out of their homes, standing in lines that
have stretched for 15 miles trying to enter countries that have no room for
them or do not want them. Or images of people from many different villages
telling the same stories -- of their friends and relatives shot and killed, of
men being
taken away to places unknown. All of this is happening to Albanians at the
hands of Serbs less than 200 miles from Belgrade, but given the responses of
Serbs it might as well be taking place on the moon.
Even in 1913,
during a similar uprooting of Kosovars, there were louder voices of dissent in
Serbia.
Obviously, neither Serbs nor any other people can be expected
to look much beyond their own fear and suffering when their cities are being
struck by rockets and bombs. It is unrealistic to assume that any Serb might
denounce the Serb assault on Albanians or that any such cry inside the country
would be loud enough to be heard above the cheering and rallying around the
chants of wartime chauvinism.
Those few media organs in Serbia that
have bravely struggled for years to maintain independence in the face of
government control have been squelched. The radio station B-92 was shut down
by police last week but even before that it reported that it was not able to
report on what was happening in Kosovo. The journal Vreme has suddenly
suspended its previous criticism of the government.
The images of the
Albanian refugees that have been telecast all over the world have not been
carried by Serbian television and have been seen only by those Serbians who
have dish antennas and cable service.
Is it possible that people just
don't know what is happening to the Albanians and that therefore they bear
little or no responsibility for the support they show? Here too, Goldhagen saw
similarities with the Nazi period. "How many Germans knew that there was a
formal program of Jewish extermination? My guess is not many, but almost all
knew that their civilization was killing Jews by the tens of thousands."
America's case is no different. A good example of the apathy, the
total, deliberate disorientation, the callous lack of compassion for one's own
children and massive denial was the "Boston nanny" case and its treatment by
U.S. media. The Louise Woodward Case involved a teenage nanny, imported from
England by a Boston couple, both of whom were physicians.
What I found
most disturbing was that, in spite of the extensive media coverage, not for a
moment did anyone in prime time question why two advantaged parents, who were
physicians no less and, therefore, aware of the important needs of infants,
would abandon their baby with a stranger, so as to pursue their own career
goals. I was horrified by a prime time interview of a father, whose child had
suffered a similar fate, while under the care of a baby sitter.
When
asked what lessons he learned from the experience, i.e., the death of his
baby, he said that he would be "more careful" about who he would hire to watch
his child. It is as if the option of personally caring for one's own child
never enters the Americans' little heads That such monumental stupidity would
go unnoticed in the U.S. is a sign of the massive detachment and utter
disregard of American parents for their own children.
My own
experience was one of being severely penalized for choosing such a
non-feminist option. My child and
I suffered severe consequences in the hands of America's feminist Mafia,
merely for choosing to be with each other. Astonishingly, that included the
kidnapping and virtual destruction of my innocent
child. (1.3MB audio, please be patient)
Goldhagen noted that it would require a sizable force to burn villages
and set hundreds of thousands of residents to flight and that the people
carrying out such tasks all have relatives and friends who would bring the
accounts to general attention.
The e-mail from Serbia is characterized
by an overwhelming sense of defensiveness and unredeemed victimization. As the
correspondents denounce NATO and the United
States, there is no sense that the rockets are a response to Serb
conduct.
The Albanians, if they are mentioned at all, are referred to
as Muslims who wish to
establish a Balkan base for
guerrilla terror, or narcotics traffickers, or former allies and beneficiaries
of the Ottoman Turks. As for Serbs, they are persistently portrayed as
defenders of Christianity in Europe, heroic fighters in two world wars whose
contributions to civilization have gone unrewarded. Even writers who identify
themselves as Milosevic's opponents show more scorn than sympathy for the
Kosovar Albanians, blaming them for keeping him in power by boycotting
elections rather than voting with the opposition.
Many of the letters
mention the sacredness of Kosovo to Serbs
and cite the battle there in 1389 at which they were defeated by the Turks.
There are far fewer references to the more contemporary history of Serb
conflicts with Croats and Bosnians over the last eight years. For instance no
one mentions the destruction of Vukovar by Serbs in 1991 or the massacre of
Bosnian men and boys
in Srebrenica in 1995, an atrocity for which the military and political
leaders of the Bosnian Serbs have been indicted. Such things appear to be
missing from the current context although there are occasional accurate
references to the Croats having waged campaigns of ethnic cleansing that
chased Serbs into flight.
America's savage treatment of innocent
children has these and other dimensions, as well. There is plenty of denial,
covering up and papering over the deaths, the neurological damage, the
learning disabilities, including the huge recent increase in
cases of autism in the U.S. (see also NY Times article) and the psychological traumas. There is
active, intentional rationalization, such as the frequent surfacing of
"studies" that show how supposedly unaffected by parental neglect children who
grow up in day care are. I was told in no uncertain terms, by a chief of a
child development center, that there is "nothing wrong" with strangercare,
because, after all, she put her own babies in day care. I was told by a
physical therapist that "day care is good", because babies there are exposed
to germs, building up their immunity. There is more than this pseudoscientific
voodoo. The practice of abandoning children to the care of others has spawned
a huge industry of those who take the millions of children off the hands of
America's desperate mothers for a small fee, including utterly unqualified and
unlicensed individuals running baby warehouses in their homes to churches and nonprofit
organizations who have found a fund raising opportunity in
keeping children in their premises for extended hours.
There is a
public policy that favors adult pursuits over children's well being. And, of
course, there is the legal framework, which currently puts the U.S. in the
company of a handful of third world countries which have executions of
juvenile delinquents in the books.
And finally, besides Somalia, which
has not had an effective government in decades, the U.S. is the only country
in the world that has not ratified the Universal Convention on the
Rights of Children, the fastest and most widely ratified human rights
treaty in the world. But then, why would an adult oriented, money and sex
worshipping, self absorbed and antisocial population want rights for small children, who
don't vote don't produce dollars for them and are not big enough for sex?
But where does patriotism end and complicity in war crimes begin?
Surely there is a difference between people who are chanting "Slobo, Slobo"
and those who are burning homes, separating wives and husbands, and shooting
civilians.
Aryeh Neier, the president of the Open Society Institute
and the author of "War Crimes, Brutality, Genocide, Terror and the Struggle
for Justice," argues that in recent wars like those in Rwanda and Bosnia, there was a
greater degree of criminal responsibility on the part of ordinary citizens
than was the case in Nazi Germany.
With the Nazis, he pointed out, the
killing was highly bureaucratized, and the victims were generally unknown to
those who killed them. In Rwanda and Bosnia, he said, many of the perpetrators
knew the victims, often having lived with them, gone to school with them and
in some cases married into their families. In both places, Neier said, because
of the way people were killed, there were almost as many killers as victims.
As for Kosovo, he said there was insufficient information to determine
what was happening or how to apportion responsibility. In Tirana, the Albanian
capital, there lives an Albanian writer named Fatos Lubunja, who under the
regime of the late dictator Enver Hoxa spent 17 years in prison. Now he edits
an intellectual journal and monitors human rights abuses. In a message to a
friend he traced many instances of Serb attacks on Albanians, dating from
expulsion in 1878 when Milan Obrenovic, a Serbian king, rallied his countrymen
with the words, "The more Albanians you kick out of our land the greater
patriots you will be." Lubunja cited ethnic cleansing campaigns of 1913 and
1920, and then he addressed the questions that Goldhagen raised in his book.
He was, he said, suspicious of judgments based on assumptions that
people inevitably repeat the conduct of their ancestors. "But if we can speak
of collective guilt, I think we have to consider a long historical process of
manipulation; all those politicians, historians, writers, teachers, who have
created and nourished some dangerous myths, have manipulated history and, in
the end, created those closed-minded horrible human beings who are ready to
kill the others."
But if Milosevic's victims are known to the
population, then America's children are surely not faceless victims to their
own parents, no matter how self absorbed those parents may be.
As far
as I am concerned the American people, who only recently graduated from
"Indian" genocide and Southern slavery, have no excuse and, worse, no shame,
when it comes to neglecting, brutalizing and destroying their own children.
Mothers, women, are, naturally even more to blame. They do, after all, have
the final say on bearing children and, in today's America, they have plenty of
options, including contraception, abortion and welfare. To chose to have a
child, only to neglect and abuse him/her or to send the baby from delivery
room to the first stranger who would "care" for her/him for a few dollars, so
as to allow the mother to pursue her more "important" priorities, is
unconscionable.
What also bothers me is the manner of defending or
denying the devastation that the Americans are inflicting on their innocent
children by deflecting the argument or, in some case, flinging mud other
countries, in some sort of false patriotism.
People who care about
their societies want to fix them not to ignore or deny the problems.
The fact of the matter is that, almost without exception, Americans
pretend that the problems are not there or they minimize their catastrophic
scale or find all sorts of excuses. The result is massive ignorance,
collective dereliction of civic duty and destruction of young lives on a
genocidal scale.
This phenomenon is no different than previous such
denials and collusive attitudes that have existed in Anglo-American societies
during the genocide of native Americans and 19th century slavery.
The
Anglo-American aspect of it also has to do with a very peculiar notion of what
constitutes truth, which appears to be culturally formed and which holds that
reality is determined by popular opinion and legalistic methods, as opposed to
the scientifically based notion of reality, hence the millions of morons who
are not only devoid of basic
scientific knowledge that 10-year olds around the world take for granted,
but they also seek solutions in quack healers and new age psychics.
My
own personal experience and knowledge are quite telling.
First,
consider that I have lived on four continents and that I have encountered and
known thousands of Americans from coast to coast in all walks of life and
every possible variation of an American.
And by the way, while in
those other places no one EVER took as much as a penny from me, I have been
repeatedly and on a sustained basis victimized from the moment I landed at
this end of the Atlantic. This is truly a land of cheats liars and crooks,
fully explaining its pervasive paranoia, litigiousness and draconian security.
The standard excuse that there are good and bad elements in every society does
not hold water, because although there is good and bad in every large group
there is still a huge difference between a monastery and a penal colony.
Hitler's Germany was not a monastery and neither is today's America).
My personal survey of Americans shows that most of them and almost all
American lawyers reply with a NO to the question of whether there is such a
thing as an absolute truth. Until, that is, I point out that they have a nose
and that the earth is not flat and that those are just two of an infinite
number of such absolute truths, definitive facts.
To give you an
example, a lawyer recently told me that the only thing he was sure of was that
he existed. Upon returning from his second honeymoon a week ago I asked this
50-year old otherwise expert lawyer whether the trip included the wife of
whose existence he was not certain. His reply was that he thought it over and
that now he believes that there ARE absolute truths after all.
I am
willing to bet that Americans could come up with some sort of explanation for
what to those elsewhere, and to most immigrants in the United States,
including myself, seems to be nothing short of an astounding lack of touch
with elementary reality.
It is this systemic negation of facts that
facilitates what I see as a hideous, massive and willful neglect and abuse of
America's children.
The notion of reality by popular opinion is a
crutch for self-absolution from the guilt of one's selfish and destructive
actions that has been built into this society for the benefit of insatiably
gluttonous materialists who have no use for children, because children give
them no money and they are usually too small for sex.
When Hillary
Clinton tells single mothers that it is the government's job to keep them
working if working is what they want she does nothing short of selling out the
babies that these trashy American mothers abandoned for selfish reasons and
Hillary only does it for the sake of votes. Children are too little to vote,
but if they could, I imagine that Hillary would offer them candy or drugs.
The collusionary relationship between political leadership, parents,
judges, America's institutions and citizens in this matter is no different
that that of Germans and Hitler's regime or Milosevic's and the Serbian
population, only worse in the respect of the proximity of parents to children.
Hitler's victims were unknown strangers to most Germans. America's
children are no strangers to their parents or to their teachers.
Americans have an obligation to recognize and to acknowledge social
problems, because a problem's definition is the first step toward its
solution.
Running away from such an obligation is just giving in to
selfish easy ways out, to social facilitation or other personal gain at the
expense of those who are helpless and at our mercy.
It is easy to say
that you or I or other individuals "can't" solve America's problems. It is
easy to say that the problems are universal, therefore natural and unsolvable.
EASY does not equal RIGHT.
What is that reality?
3 million young children left home alone on a regular basis by working mothers.
Ten thousand
babies disposed by their own mothers, such as in toilets and dumpsters.
Millions of young children suffering from attention deficits and other
neurological based disorders, including autism.
While Americans like to blame all those problems on genetics and the
environment the vast majority of these ailments are of psychogenic
nature and the consequence of brutality inflicted on babies by the
money-pursuing bimbos who gave them birth.
Learning disabilities,
antisocial behavior, addiction and teenage delinquency of truly unprecedented,
epidemic proportions, afflicting the VAST MAJORITY of America's young adults.
Most American educators and others here are oblivious to the scope and
nature of these problems because their own peculiar behavioral "science" and
their own unreal sense of reality, coupled with their propensity for
accommodating popular opinion for the sake of social facilitation (to me that
makes "polite societies" quite evil) leads them to believe that their symptoms
are "normal".
Let me give you an example of this.
Back in
Oregon I had an office manager working for me who was otherwise competent. She
was also patriotic (in the same very false way that most Americans get
offended when one with a foreign accent points America's social problems, as
opposed to the correct reaction, namely to turn red and then run to find a
solution).
At that time, a young employee of mine, whose rare (in that
American community) intelligence had prompted me to nick name him "Mozart"
stole about $2000 from me (I have come to the conclusion that it is almost
impossible to find an American born employee who is industrious, competent,
intelligent and honest all at the same time, which is why I choose immigrants
whenever possible).
When I asked the office manager why a young man
who was otherwise so nice and bright would do such a thing, her reply was that
it was "normal teenager rebellion". I tried to explain to her that neither I
nor anyone I knew back home ever felt compelled to commit a crime as a
teenager and she was completely mystified.
Americans just don't get
it, they don't want to get it and they obstinately refuse to get it because it
is more convenient and comforting to deny reality and to avoid responsibility
or guilt. In my opinion that makes them shameless creeps. As far as I am
concerned, not knowing is forgivable ignorance, but refusing to know is just
plain evil, worse than the "evil" label that they inflicted on the
authoritarian former Soviet Union.
Americans must not pretend not to
know why they shoot each other or say that their children's physical and
emotional damage was caused by nature or acts of God. Let's not diminish their
scope by stating the presence of similar problems elsewhere. It is essential
to use logical, scientific thinking in defining these problems and in
acknowledging their scope and real causes, because without such acknowledgment
the inevitable self-destruction of this society which America's foremost
sociologists predict will indeed come true.
Of course, the hideous
mistreatment by the Americans of those close to them is not limited to their
children.
A trip to Southbury Training School, Willowbrook or any of
the hundreds of similar, vast American facilities used to warehouse
developmentally disabled people, but also the thousands of nursing homes and
hundreds of thousands of institutional and residential "child care centers"
can only begin to hint at the scope of the American's massive indifference
towards those in their families who are helpless.
My personal
encounter with this phenomenon precedes the destruction of my child. A very
interesting example is a lady I met in Oregon .
This woman, Carol,
asked me to watch her cat while on a trip to Wisconsin. She explained to me
that her father was in a nursing home and that she was going back home to work
with her relatives on selling the farm in order to finance the high cost of
nursing home care.
I tried to find out why it was that she, who said
she loved her aging father, did not herself personally care for him. She said,
oh, I am in Oregon and he is in Wisconsin. I asked whether her father would be
willing to move to Oregon to be with her and her reply was that she was too
busy working to care for him. When I asked what it is that she did for a
living she said that she took care of an old woman in town three days a week.
Go figure..
Similarly, there have been mothers of newborn babies who
applied to help me care for my daughter while their babies would be left with
a cheaper stranger.
Regarding the raising of children, the issue with
the feminists is that, if a woman belongs in the White House, what's a man
doing changing diapers, in a manner that the Holly Inquisition persecuted
those who dared to propose that the earth orbits the sun
(is the Pope listening this time?) and this has led to the
maniacal pursuit of those fathers, such as myself, who chose to personally
care for an infant, so as not to allow a vicious mother to abandon her into
the hands of strangers.
The additional presumption of the credibility
of non-working mothers vs. non-working fathers is what, in this case, put the
last nail in the coffin of America's fatherhood.
Mine was one of many
cases, where the female is presumed to have a child's best interest in mind,
very much analogous to the Hitler or Stalin having the best interest of their
people. It is astounding that, upon questioning a physician about a "from
birth" entry in Teddy's report, she said "her mother said so". And this came
from an American pediatric neurologist who was seen on the advice of a female
lawyer, behind my back and without my prior knowledge, at a time when her
mother was legally required to discuss medical/educational matters BEFORE she
acted.
What really blew my mind was when, in spite of voluminous and
definitive evidence to the contrary which I presented to courts in two states,
a male judge in Oregon, in irregular complicity with a New York (anti)Family
Court female judge, pronounced my daughter's acquired disabilities as
"congenital".
Most definitively this is a baby killing society and
I call upon the billions of people outside of America to not allow this CRIME OF THE MILLENNIUM to go
unnoticed.
Theodora Evanthia Isabella Samora
Coutsoukis was born in excellent health, with flawless genes, high
neonatal scores, athletic and brilliant.
Teddy
is now a mere shadow of her
former self.
So, I have made it my purpose in life to expose
America's sadistic feminocrats, and that makes me a lousy American, but
an excellent Greek.
